Manage and Improve Performance, Part 4 of 8, Feedback, Development Plans and Fair Assessment

Managing and improving performance begins with understanding current performance. A leader cannot create a useful development plan, provide fair feedback or address a performance concern properly without first paying attention to what is actually happening. This means observing work, listening carefully, checking outcomes and noticing patterns over time.

Good observation looks at both strengths and areas for development. Too often, performance conversations are associated only with problems. PUATEA003 takes a wider view. Team development plans are built from identified strengths and weaknesses, which means leaders should recognise what people do well as carefully as they notice where improvement is needed. Strengths can be built on, shared and used to support team performance. Weaknesses can be addressed through guidance, practice, training or clearer expectations.

In a public safety team, performance may be seen in communication, task completion, documentation, role understanding, cooperation, reliability, professional behaviour and the ability to apply required standards. Leaders should avoid jumping to conclusions from one moment alone unless an immediate issue requires action. A broader view helps create fairer judgement and better support.

Observation should also be connected to organisational requirements. The leader is not assessing people against personal preference. The leader is comparing performance with expected work requirements, team responsibilities, procedures and professional standards. This keeps the process grounded, fair and useful.

Mark Section 1 Refreshed

PUATEA003 states that team development plans are based on identified strengths and weaknesses of team members. This gives leaders a clear starting point. A development plan should not be generic, copied without thought or disconnected from the team’s actual needs. It should reflect the capability that already exists and the areas where further growth is required.

Strengths matter because they show what can be reinforced and used wisely. A team member may be highly organised, calm under pressure, accurate with records, supportive with newer personnel or strong in practical problem-solving. These strengths can be acknowledged and, where appropriate, used to lift the team. For example, a leader may encourage a reliable team member to help model a process, contribute to a team discussion or support a less experienced colleague within organisational limits.

Weaknesses matter because they point to development needs. A weakness is not automatically a failure. It may show that expectations were not clear enough, practice has been limited, support has been uneven or a new responsibility requires further confidence. A good leader does not label the person. They identify the performance need and help create a pathway forward.

A useful development plan often includes the current strength or gap, the desired improvement, the support required, who is involved, how progress will be reviewed and the expected workplace benefit. It should be clear enough that both leader and team member understand what is being worked on. The plan should also match organisational policies and procedures where formal documentation or approval is required.

Mark Section 2 Refreshed

The unit requires regular and constructive feedback on all aspects of work performance to be provided to individuals and the team. The word regular is important. Feedback should not appear only when something goes wrong or when a formal performance process begins. When leaders provide feedback as a normal part of team life, people are less likely to feel ambushed and more likely to treat feedback as a tool for improvement.

Regular feedback can take different forms. It may be a quick acknowledgement after a task, a short debrief after a team activity, a private conversation about a work habit, or a structured discussion during a review process. The format may change, but the principle remains the same: feedback should help people understand how their performance connects with expectations.

Constructive feedback is specific, respectful and improvement-focused. It does not attack the person. It explains the behaviour or work outcome, why it matters and what should continue or change. For positive feedback, this means naming what worked well so that good practice can be repeated. For improvement feedback, this means being clear enough that the team member knows what to do differently.

Feedback also needs balance. A leader who only corrects can damage confidence. A leader who only praises can avoid necessary improvement conversations. Strong performance leadership recognises good work honestly and addresses gaps respectfully. Both are needed if the team is to develop.

Mark Section 3 Refreshed

PUATEA003 makes it clear that feedback applies to individuals and the team. This distinction matters. Some matters are personal to one team member, such as a skill gap, a repeated documentation error or a professional behaviour concern. These usually require a respectful private conversation and a clear pathway for support or correction.

Other matters affect the whole team. A team may be completing a routine inconsistently, communicating unevenly across shifts, missing a shared standard or struggling to apply a new practice. In these cases, the leader may need to provide group feedback, clarify expectations and create a team-level improvement plan. Treating a team issue as one person’s problem can be unfair. Treating an individual issue as a public team problem can be embarrassing and unhelpful.

Leaders therefore need judgement. They should consider who needs the feedback, who is affected by the issue and what setting best supports improvement. Team feedback should still be constructive. It should not become a vague criticism of “everyone”. It should describe the shared work issue clearly, explain why it matters and guide the team toward a stronger approach.

Individual feedback should also remain respectful. A leader can be direct without being harsh. The purpose is to improve performance, not to win a confrontation. This is especially important in public safety environments where trust, confidence and professional relationships support effective teamwork.

Mark Section 4 Refreshed

The third performance criterion for this element states that performance is assessed and addressed in accordance with organisational policies and procedures. This is essential. Leaders are not expected to invent their own performance process or act on personal preference. They are expected to work within the organisation’s approved approach.

Fair assessment begins with relevant evidence. What was expected? What was observed? What records, outcomes or conversations help clarify the situation? What support has already been provided? These questions matter because performance assessment should be defensible, consistent and linked to work requirements. A leader should be careful not to confuse personality differences with performance issues.

Addressing performance may take different forms depending on the concern and the organisation’s procedures. It may involve informal guidance, additional clarification, coaching, a development plan, more structured documentation or referral to relevant personnel where required. The leader’s role is to respond at the right level, use the right pathway and avoid ignoring issues that require action.

This protects the team as well as the individual. When performance issues are left unaddressed, other team members may carry extra load, standards may drift and frustration can build. When issues are handled unfairly, confidence in leadership can drop. The best approach is steady, evidence-based and respectful.

Performance management should always point toward organisational objectives and appropriate working relationships. The goal is not simply to identify deficiency. The goal is to restore, strengthen or maintain performance so that the person and the team can meet required standards more reliably.

Mark Section 5 Refreshed

The strongest response balances fairness, clarity and development. It recognises strengths, identifies a real performance gap, provides constructive feedback and sets a practical improvement pathway. It also protects dignity by choosing an appropriate setting and follows the principle that performance should be assessed and addressed properly.

Mark Section 6 Refreshed